湖北科技学院学报

当前，裁判文书上网遭受理论质疑和实践挑战。质疑的观点认为，裁判文书上网制度改革局促、动因不明，应当回归追求司法公正的本位价值，弱化甚至摒弃其参与社会诚信体系建设等功能。现实挑战表现为，裁判文书上网率呈现断崖式下降，并且存在规范性问题，社会治理功能难以体现。理论上，裁判文书上网制度的改革并不局促，具有参与社会诚信体系建设等众多社会治理功能，人民法院作为参与社会治理的主体之一，应当通过裁判文书上网充分参与社会治理。实践中，应当公开裁判文书的个人非隐私信息，规范裁判文书上网程序，以最大程度上发挥其追求司法公正与参与社会治理的功能。

Currently, the online disclosure of judicial documents faces theoretical questioning and practical challenges.The skeptical viewpoint holds that the reform of the online disclosure system for judicial documents is limited with unclear motives.It should return to the core value of pursuing judicial fairness, weaken or even abandon its functions in participating in the construction of the social integrity system.The real challenge is that the online publication rate of judicial documents has shown a steep decline, and there are normative issues that make it difficult to reflect the social governance function.In theory, the reform of the online disclosure system for judicial documents is not limited, and it has many social governance functions such as participating in the construction of a social integrity system.As one of the main bodies participating in social governance, the people's court should fully participate in social governance through the online publication of judicial documents.In practice, non-private personal information of judicial documents should be made public, and the online procedures for judicial documents should be standardized to maximize their function of pursuing judicial justice and participating in social governance.